![]() “He told this politicized version that was flattering to the powers that were in his time,” Wilson said. Wilson, author of “Shakespeare and Trump” and “Richard III’s Bodies.” Theater in general was viewed as illusory and deceptive, he said. “His very few representations of royals recent to his time were pretty flattering, and and early audiences even called them patriotic,” said Harvard teacher-scholar Jeffrey R. Plays were approved by the master of the revels, a sort of civil servant with the power of censorship, said Dickson, author of “Worlds Elsewhere: Journeys Around Shakespeare’s Globe” and “The Globe Guide to Shakespeare.” Authors could and were imprisoned, or worse, for transgressions, he said. Actually, it was like Stalinist Russia in many ways,” Shakespearean expert Andrew Dickson said of the rigidly controlled society in which the bard worked circa 1585 to 1613. ![]() “We all imagine it being sort of sweetness and light, and we’ve all seen ‘Shakespeare in Love’ and everyone’s sitting around drinking. The recent criticism may suggest his winter of discontent is ahead, but Morgan has it easier than another writer who feasted on the British monarchs as material: William Shakespeare, who dramatized the reigns of seven kings.Īll were in the past, with Shakespeare treading lightly around the rulers of his time, Elizabeth I and James I. Morgan, writer of the movie “The Queen” and play “The Audience,” both starring the Oscar- and Tony-winning Helen Mirren as Elizabeth II, has made royals a specialty. ”There have been four seasons where people know it’s been written by Peter Morgan and his team of writers.” “I think it’s underestimating the audience,” Staunton told AP. Imelda Staunton, stepping in as the latest actor to play Elizabeth, defended the series, its award-winning creator and its viewers. I have to say they’re treated with a great deal of integrity and a great deal of sensitivity.” They don’t know how these issues are treated. “I think a lot of the protests this time, people haven’t seen this series. Whitehouse had “a huge following and she criticized programs she’d never seen,” he said. Series creator Peter Morgan was unavailable for comment, Netflix said.ĭench is not amused by the streaming service’s intransigence. It’s a demand that Netflix has heard before and continues to resist, framing the series as drama inspired by historical events. She called for each episode to carry a disclaimer labeling it as fiction. The death of Queen Elizabeth, 96, in September adds an uneasy dimension: We speculate freely about the famous before and after they’re gone, but is more owed a country’s beloved and longest-serving monarch?Īmong the prominent critics is Judi Dench, an Oscar-winner for her role as Elizabeth I in “Shakespeare in Love.” In a letter to The Times of London, the actor blasted elements of the drama as “cruelly unjust to the individuals and damaging to the institution they represent.” The safe distance of history is gone in the 10 new episodes set within recent memory for many and whose stories, sight unseen, have been denounced. The queen famously labeled one stretch her “annus horribilis” - Latin for “horrible year.” There’s swirling off-stage drama as well for the Netflix series that began with Elizabeth’s marriage in the late 1940s and, in its fifth season, takes on the British royal family’s turbulent 1990s.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |